Even though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are unique powders, you will discover that in many occasions, where one of them is detailed the opposite are going to be in addition. Also, you will discover there is a reasonably consistent connection amongst them with reference to shown loads.
Of course, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of various whole lot numbers, but I feel I realize why. It's a litigation-pushed globe, and several fool would certainly deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his very own custom combination of powder. What a entire world.
Liberalism; The difficult but recognized Idea that it's completely achievable to select up a turd through the thoroughly clean close.
That means the knowledgable handloader can, with a few extrapolation, discover a starting off load when only one is mentioned for a particular cartridge.
INgunner54 stated: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some groups.
I do know, tough instances. H4831SC will certainly function, I just failed to like the case density when loaded prolonged. I don't try to remember powder charge off the best of my head but I had been launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which can be where by I generally intention to generally be. Within your scenario using what you have got (and what I should have completed) I'd personally get started with the end on the bearing floor of the bullet proper with the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there once you look for a velocity node.
If there is no load data it is actually for the reason that this powder isn't appropriate for this cartridge. Commonly one is not going to come across a person powder to fit all cartridges, along with the spouse and children of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you will be asking about will not operate.
Im under the comprehension I wish to use h4831sc. I have read that these powders are similar Other than the shorter grain dimension h4831sc with the sc. Must I however be on the lookout for h4381sc?
I could stack em in a single gap but I wasn’t satisfied with the velocity. Right after months, I obtained Blessed and caught some H1000 on line and of course paid out a little additional. The really following week in a gun show a guy experienced a complete case of H1000 for $40 for each 1lb. I forget just how much, but With all the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a gentle h4831 vs h4831sc load.
Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain measurement, therefore, the designation SC or limited Minimize. The shorter, more compact kernels allow the powder to move with the powder actions more effortlessly, helping to reduce the constant reducing of granules.
Kansas Town, MO I would seize whatever is on the market right now. I’ve employed the two however with my check out load and didn’t see anything various functionality clever.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a limited supply of Varget, along with a good deal far more readily available H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Just about completely, for the reason that that is what the rifles shoot the best.
Am i able to assume that H4831 might be substituted for H4831sc ? I understand the Bodily difference but will it have an effect on the burn up or velocity? I feel not but I'm not one hundred% confident.
I sawed 1 in fifty percent to determine how thick the jackets have been, and so they have been conveniently two times as thick for a 50-grain hollow position was. Ditto to the 64-grain Energy Stage, as these bullets are constructed for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know every thing I know about the 22-250 and gradual-burning powders, and I h4831 vs h4831sc don't know anything at all in any respect regarding the 223. I doubt that you are going to get any place with that cartridge and 4831, but allow us to know the way it goes.